Archive for Shariah

Variety is the spice of life in Islamic finance

Variety is the spice of life in Islamic finance

Reuters
Published: April 26, 2008, 00:35

Despite growth rates at least twice as high as those recorded on global conventional financial markets, the Islamic financial industry remains fraught with diversity and heterogeneity, says Moody’s Investors Service in its special report entitled Islamic Banks and Sukuk: Growing Fast, but Still Fragmented.

Modern Islamic finance is a recent phenomenon. Only 30 years have passed since the first fully fledged Islamic financial institutions (IFIs) emerged, and the market for Sukuk (Islamic bonds) was virtually non-existent as recently as the beginning of this century.

Today, estimations tend to value the Islamic financial industry – which comprises about 300 Sharia-compliant banks, takaful (or Islamic mutual insurance) companies and mutual funds in line with the principles of Islamic finance – at more than $700 billion in terms of assets.

“The market for Sukuk alone, accounting for around $100 billion at year-end 2007, has exceeded the GDP of a country the size of Morocco,” says Anouar Hassoune, a Moody’s analyst and author of the report.

Moody’s notes that current excess liquidity prevailing in Gulf econ-omies since 11 September 2001 has fuelled both sustained demand for the products supplied by IFIs and the booming expansion of the market for Sukuk, while contributing to creating a very close link between Islamic banks and what remains to date a relatively illiquid compartment of the bond market. Nevertheless, the rating agency expects liquidity in the Sukuk market to improve gradually as the variety of Sukuk issuances widens.

Not only are volumes expected to exceed $150 billion by the end of the current decade, but the nature, geographic location and credit quality of future issuers are also expected to considerably evolve and diversify.

At this stage, the Islamic financial industry remains very much intermediated – or, in other words, more widely dominated by financial intermediaries capturing deposits to recycle them into on-balance-sheet asset portfolios than by disincarnated, de-territorialised and virtual capital markets.

Weakly co-ordinated

Moody’s notes that some 90 per cent of Sharia-compliant assets are concentrated on IFIs’ balance sheets and on those of conventional banks offering Islamic financial services and products through “Islamic windows”. Islamic finance is becoming increasingly “internationalised,” but essentially remains a collection of disseminated and still weakly co-ordinated local operations.

“A number of forces within the Islamic financial universe tend to contribute to its fragmentation. The core principles underlying Islamic financial products, although subject to vast consensus as to their formal content, remain differently interpreted and differently weighted in practice,” says Hassoune.

In Moody’s opinion, the lack of technical and contractual standardisation impedes the capacity of Islamic finance, as an alternative financing and investment model, to enhance its globalisation process, without necessarily forbidding its internationalisation.

Initiatives aiming at either introducing Islamic finance or strengthening its position are mushrooming across a wider range of countries, whether home to majority Muslim populations or not, but these remain country specific and weakly co-ordinated, despite the sustained endeavour of several cross-border organisations to bring some consistency to the concept.

“Building in prospective views is not an easy task in such a young industry. Nevertheless, we expect the Sukuk market to become more complex, more structured, larger, more diversified and more liquid as it evolves over time,” adds Hassoune.

Equally, IFIs are expected to explore new geographic horizons as well as new business lines, become more competitive and (paradoxically) contribute to the gradual emergence of a more disintermediated Islamic financial industry – one with a reduced presence of Islamic banks.

Source: http://www.gulfnews.com/business/Banking_and_Finance/10208467.html

Leave a Comment

The UK’s Development as a Major Marketplace for Islamic Finance

The UK’s Development as a Major Marketplace for Islamic Finance
Anouar Hassoune, Standard & Poor’s – Emmanuel Volland, Standard & Poor’s – 23 Jul 2007

The UK is set to become the first non-Muslim country to be a major financial centre of Islamic finance. This article looks at the conditions that have allowed Islamic finance to grow in the UK, and how it may move forward.

Competition is heating up among the world’s financial centres to attract Islamic issuers and investors. So far, Dubai, Kuala Lumpur, Bahrain and, to a lesser extent, Riyadh and Singapore, are all well placed to capture part of the booming Islamic finance industry. The latest entrant is London, the only financial centre actively involved in Sharia-compliant market intermediation that is not in a Muslim country. London, as a financial centre, has a number of competitive advantages compared with its emerging-market counterparts, including:

* Large size and international reach.
* Deep, efficient markets, where investors can switch from one asset class to another (including in and out of sukuk).
* Liquidity in the secondary market.
* Tremendous human resources and expertise (including research, analysis, operations, and structuring capabilities).

In addition, the legal environment is robust. The tax regime applicable to sukuk coupons will make them deductible – no longer viewing them as rental payments but equivalent to interest. Announced 21 March 2007, among other initiatives pertaining to Islamic finance, this sukuk-friendly amendment to tax law in the UK stands to make London more attractive for issuing and trading sukuk, although Dubai has been so far the most active trading centre for sukuk notes. The largest sukuk to date were those issued by Dubai-based Nakheel Group for US$3.52bn early in the first quarter of 2007. These notes were listed in both Dubai and London.

The overall size of the sukuk market worldwide is estimated at nearly US$70bn,including issuance from Malaysia, Pakistan and, of course, the Middle East. However, the bulk of sukuk are over-the-counter instruments. Listed sukuk account for only 20-25% of outstanding sukuk issued worldwide, that is, US$10-15bn so far. There are more sukuk listed in Dubai than anywhere else, but the secondary market is virtually non-existent. Second is London, where the secondary market for sukuk totalled less than US$5bn at 21 March 2007. Among listed sukuk, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services rates close to US$6bn or roughly 50% of sukuk outstanding that is listed globally. New sukuk issuance is expected to accelerate, and could reach US$20-25bn in the next five years, according to the most reasonable forecasts.

We believe that the global Islamic financial industry will benefit from the UK’s development as an attractive marketplace for Sharia-compliant financing and investment instruments – on both the wholesale and retail side. We estimate that up to 300,000 retail customers in the UK would be ready customers for Sharia-compliant banking services. The establishment of these services in the UK would extend the reach of the Islamic financial model – so far still concentrated in a few countries in the Middle East and Muslim parts of Asia. As for wholesale banking, London has the capacity to become a hub for Sharia-compliant financial flows that seek recycling in Europe. For example, Islamic investment banks such as the Bahrain-based Arcapita Bank B.S.C. and Gulf Finance House, both have offices in London where vast amounts of liquidity from the Gulf meet attractive Sharia-compliant asset classes packaged in private equity, real estate, and infrastructure funds domiciled in the more mature and stable European economies.

The UK intends to become a key player in market intermediation for sukuk. Competition from western financial centres is low, as limited appetite for Islamic finance is coming from New York, more interested in facilitating the trading of Sharia-compliant stocks, especially through the Dow Jones Islamic Index and, more recently, through the newly created family of Standard & Poor’s Sharia indices. London, on the contrary, has a wider approach to Islamic finance, encompassing a broader range of financial instruments and asset classes. For example, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) has recently licensed the European Islamic Investment Bank, a wholesale financial institution created expressly to recycle the massive amounts of institutional and private liquidity in the Gulf into Sharia-compliant asset classes originated in mature, stable, and transparent western markets.

The FSA has taken on an Islamic retail strategy in keeping with its mission that aims for inclusion. This principle aims at combating financial exclusion, that is, the incapacity or unwillingness of households to access banking services because of distance, poverty or religion.

Some UK citizens do not actively deal with banks simply because banking in the UK is based on interest, called ‘riba’ in Arabic, considered unlawful according to Sharia, or Islamic law. To prevent Muslim customers being excluded from the banking market because of their beliefs, the FSA has given its green light to established conventional banks to offer Sharia-compliant services. Both HSBC, through its Amanah brand, and Lloyds TSB already offer Islamic banking services.

The FSA has also recently licensed a fully-fledged Islamic financial institution, the Islamic Bank of Britain, to serve the UK retail market with Sharia-compliant products. For Sharia-compliant services to become more comprehensive in the UK, the country needs to offer takaful (or Islamic mutual insurance). Licensing a takaful company or allowing conventional insurers to offer takaful products could be the next step in the UK’s strategy to further enhance its position as a leading Islamic financial centre.

The UK itself might be interested in issuing sukuk notes. Such issuance would be of high interest for investors who adhere to or favour Islamic finance. If the country did so, its issuance would be the second to carry an AAA rating, after sukuk issued by the Islamic Development Bank in 2005 for US$1bn. In addition, the UK would be the third sovereign outside the Middle East to issue Sharia-compliant paper, after Malaysia in 2002 through a US$600m structure called Malaysia Global Sukuk Inc. Japan has also expressed its intention to tap liquidity in the Gulf through the issuance of Sharia-compliant notes. The German State of Saxony-Anhalt has also issued sukuk, through a vehicle called Stichting Sachsen-Anhalt Trust for €100m in 2004.

http://www.gtnews.com/article/6846.cfm

Leave a Comment

Origins and Operations of Takaful System

Note: I’ve found this explanation on Takaful as one of the best and comprehensive from Takaful Taawuni website.

Origins and Operations of Takaful System

Background Elements to Takaful

Four fundamental factors must co-exist to establish the proper framework for a Takaful system:

A. Nea’a, or utmost sincerity of intention for knowingly following guidance and adhering to the rules of a Takaful system.

B. Integration of Shariah Conditions, namely: risk protection sharing under ta’awuni principle, coincidence of ownership, participation in management by policyholders, avoidance of Riba and prohibited investments, and inclusion of al Mudharabah or Wakalah principles for Takaful management.

C. Presence of Moral Values and Ethics, business is conducted openly in accordance with utmost good faith, honesty, full disclosure, truthfulness and fairness in all dealings.

D. No Unlawful Element that contravenes Shariah and strict adherence to Islamic rules for commercial contracts; namely the key elements present are:

* Parties have Legal Capacity (ie. +18 years old) and are mental fit

* Insurable Interest

* Principle of Indemnity prevails

* Payment of Premium is consideration (offer and acceptance)

* Mutual Consent (which includes voluntary purification)

* Specific Time Period of Policy and underlying Agreement

Main Objections against Conventional Insurance

While there a number of objectionable elements existing with conventional insurance, three main ones stand out.

Qard Al Hassan

According to Islamic principles, only one type of loan, Qard el Hasan (lit. good or benevolent loan) is allowable. Under the concept of Qard el Hassan, the lender may not charge interest or any premium above the actual loan amount. Some Muslim jurists state that this restriction includes directly or indirectly any benefits associated with the loan: “…this prohibition applies to any advantage or benefits that a lender might secure out of the qard (loan), such as riding the borrower’s mule, eating at his table, or even taking advantage of the shade of his wall.”

Muslims are encouraged to invest actively in ventures with an intent to share profits or losses that may result, rather than becoming a passive creditor. Unlike conventional commercial banking (largely based upon fixed, guaranteed rates of return-interest), this mutual sharing of risk promotes communal enterprises, risk-taking and productive activities. Monies are not sitting idle or invested at nominal, fixed rates of return. Instead, monies are applied to commercial transactions or agarian cultivation where risks and rates of return are balanced. A higher degree of risk in investment attracts a concomitant high rate of return to investors, provides stimulus to an economy and creates an environment for entrepreneurs to maximize their productive efforts.

By contrast, most conventional insurers invest premiums in bonds/loans (corporate and municipal) as well as other interest generating investments (involving Riba from Islamic perspective).

Riba (Interest/Premium/Usury)

The single most important aspect that differentiates Islamic finance from conventional finance and banking is the absence of interest. As discussed earlier, the Sharia prohibits both the taking and paying of interest (Riba) no matter what the purpose of the transaction, or the amount of interest charged. Apart from a minority interpretation of Sharia by a few Scholars, the consensus among Islamic jurists is that Riba and interest are the same.

There are four occasions in the Holy Quran where Riba is clearly prohibited. Refer to V.30:39; V.4:161; V.3:130 and V.2:275-276.

In the Yusuf Ali translation, Riba is described in commentary as “undue profit made, not in the way of legitimate trade, but out of loans of gold and silver, and necessary articles of food, such as wheat, barley, dates and sale…including profiteering of all kinds, but exclude economic credit, the creator of modern banking and finance…” He goes on to comment on the relationship of debitor-creditor in the four verses that follow: “…on behalf of debtors, as creditors are asked to (a) give up even claims arising out of past on account of usury, and (b) to give time for payment of capital if necessary, or (c) to write off the debt altogether as an act of charity.”

The use of Riba is clearly prohibited by Prophet Muhammed (PBUH) in a Hadith, where the Prophet (PBUH) condemned those who accept interest, as well as those who pay it or are witness to such a transaction.

Riba, however, circumscribes other aspects that makes commercial transactions suspect as well: “The Prophet (PBUH) forbade indeterminent, doubtful or speculative transactions or selling something before having possession of it.” “The Prophet (PBUH) forbade purchases from needy people and purchases involving uncertainty such as the sale of fruit before its maturity. “

Al Gharar (Uncertainty)

All commercial transactions must contain full disclosure. In other words, any transaction entered into should be free of uncertainty, deception and unknown elements or speculation. Al parties involved should have “full disclosure” or knowledge of the “counter values intended to be exchanged as a result” of the transaction, including the fact that “profits” cannot be guaranteed. The purpose of this prohibition is to avoid exploitation and injustice, especially on the part of the holder of capital.

Examples of prohibited transactions include: options, futures, derivatives, short sales and forward foreign exchange transactions (rates are determined by interest differentials). A number of transactions are treated as exceptions to the rule of Gharar. Such commercial transactions contain special treatments to assure they are organized to minimize harm and risk to both parties. Such transactions are:

1. Sales with payment in advance (bai’bithaman ajil)

2. Contract to manufacture (Istisna)

3. Hire contract (Ijara).

Specifically, Takaful transactions are design to minimize Al Gharar since the risk of future events can neither be known in advance nor influenced in any way. Note that the mere fact of purchase of a Takaful Contract in no manner affects future events nor does it guarantee that any specific outcome will/will not occur. Obviously, nothing in a Takaful operations can influence Al Qadar (Allah’s swt destiny).

Precedents for Islamic Insurance (Takaful)

An Islamic alternative to contemporary insurance is known as Takaful, and is based on the concept of Ta’awun, or mutual assistance. Ta’awun forms the basis of many Islamic practices. The teaching of Islam in regard to the equality and brotherhood of believers, and their responsibilities toward one another and all humanity led to several forms of mutual assistance both social and economic. Takaful as practiced in the sixth century (Christian Era A.D. and +50 Hijrah) actually evolved from tribal practices of mutual assistance dating back to pre Islamic times. There are several examples in pre-Islamic history whereby families, tribes or related members throughout the Arabia peninsula pooled their resources as a mean to help the needy on a voluntary and gratuitous basis. There practices were validated by Prophet Muhammed (PBUH) and incorporated into the institutions of the early Islamic State in Arabia around 650 C.E.

Examples of these early Islamic practices include the following:

* Merchants of Mecca formed funds to assist victims of natural disasters or hazards of trade journeys.

* Surety called daman khatr al-tariq was placed on traders against losses suffered during a journey due to hazards on trade routes.

* Assistance was provided to captives and the families of murder victims through a grouping known as a’qila.

* Contracts, called ‘aqd muwalat, were entered into for bringing about an end to mutual amity or revenge.

* Confederation were brought about by means of a hilf, or an agreements for mutual assistance among people.

Origins of Bloodrite in Islam

Before the time of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) , raids, looting, and traditions to revenge those killed were a common fact of nomadic Arab life. The hardships of desert life and a war-like vigilance forged a unity amongst groups wherein a group would act as a social unit .

In the words of Dr. M. Muslehuddin: “..not only does the unit consider the loss of its individual member as its own, it also takes steps to cover such loss, either by revenge and blood-letting, or alternatively by payment of blood money” by the group on behalf of the individual.” Such a perspective towards life and early society can be viewed as an early form of insurance (mutual self-protection).

The practice of blood money, or “wergild” was sustained for nearly a thousand years as a provision against danger to which a group of persons are all equally subject. A group united by blood-ties and family-ties comes to the aid of a member through mutual action. Hence, the custom of sharing in common. This practice was used for plundered property as well as compensation for the loss of life to avoid feud and unchecked destruction. The Arabic term for bloodtie is maaqil , which is derived from aql or aqila.

{Note: The vestiges of these practices still exist in Saudi Arabia today. Motorists who cause injury or death are obliged to pay a “wergild” to the victim’s family.}

During the emergence of Islam( 623-670 CE), some of these customs, including ‘aqila were sanctioned by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). In this way, these customs became part of the Sunnah (collection of sayings and practices of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and subject to regulations by the Shari’ah.

The principle of maaqil was affirmed by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as related in the following story from the Sunnah.

“Allah’s Apostle gave this verdict about two ladies of the Hudhail tribe who had fought each other and one of them had hit the other with a stone. The stone hit her abdomen and as she was pregnant, the blow killed the child in her womb. They both filed their case with the Prophet and he judged that the blood money was for what was in her womb. The guardian of the lady who was fined said,”O Allah’s apostle! Shall I be fined for a creature that has neither drunk nor eaten, neither spoke nor cried? A case like that should be nullified” On that the Prophet said, “This is one of the brothers of soothsayers.”

Two ladies (had a fight) and one of them hit the other with a stone on the abdomen and caused her to abort. The Prophet judged that the victim be given either a slave or a female slave (as blood-money). Narrated Ibn Shihab: Said bin Al-Musayyab said, “Allah’s apostle judged that in case of child killed in the womb of its mother, the offender should give the mother a slave or a female slave in recompense. The offender said, “How can I be fined for killing one who neither ate nor drank, neither spoke nor cried: a case like that should be denied.” On that Allah’s Apostle said “He is one of the brothers of the foretellers.” {Sahih Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 71, Number 654-655, Narrated by Abu Hurairah.}

The decree in this case was that the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) decided that the second woman’s kin would pay a penalty to the relatives of the first woman who was killed (aqila), in accordance with established custom.

Mutual assistance amongst members of a tribe was not originally a commercial transaction and contained no profit or gain at the expense of others. Rather, it evolved as a social institution: to mitigate the burden of an individual by dividing it among his fellow members (group persons) or tribe. In contrast, most modern insurance (even mutual stock insurance entities, but not mutual associations) is a capitalist-based commercial enterprise, where losses are projected in advance and funds (premiums) allocated to risks to cover them. Premiums are paid in line with such projections of risk.

In short, the former practice involves compensation for actual losses upon occurrence by dividing them among the group, whereas, the latter involves the transfer of losses in advance based upon past experiences. This transfer often is from policyholders (the group) to shareholders (owner of insurance company) and thus voids the age-old principle of mutual assistance .

It is noteworthy that the first Constitution in Medinah (622 C.E.) arranged by Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) contained three aspects directly relating to insurance.

· Provision for social insurance affecting the Jews, Ansar and the Christians.

· Article 3 which included “the immigrants among the Quraish shall be responsible for their word and shall pay their blood money in mutual collaboration.”

· Provision for Fidya (ransom) whereby payment is made to rescue the life of a prisoner and the aqila (relatives) could cooperate to free him.

Takaful Referenced with the Qur’an and Sunnah

Although the word Takaful does not appear in the Holy Quran, it is derived from the term Ta’awun, or mutual assistance and connotes the same meaning. The second verse of Surah 5 in the Holy Quran exhorts the individual to assist others:

* “Assist one another in the doing of good and righteousness. Assist not one another in sin and transgression, but keep your duty to Allah” V.5:2.

In addition, many of the virtuous customs from the pre-Islamic period of Jahiliyya were declared “Islamic” by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) when he said: ” the virtues of the Jahiliyya are acted upon in Islam.” He further clarified this point in the constitution written in Medinah.

* They {Muslims of the Quraysh and Yathrib tribes} are one community (ummah) to exclusion of all men. The Quraysh emigrants according to their personal custom shall pay the blood-rite {aqila} within their number and shall redeem their prisoners with the kindness and justice common among believers.”

* Believers are to other believers like parts of a structure that tighten and reinforce each other.” Al-Bukhari and Muslim .

* The Believer, in their affection, mercy and sympathy towards each other, are like the body- if one of its organs suffers and complains, the entire body responds with insomnia and fever.” Muslim.

Given the Quranic admonition to “assist one another” and the words of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) regarding mutual assistance, Takaful may be understood as an imperative upon Muslim believers:

* “… a system based on solidarity, peace of mind and mutual protection which provides mutual financial and other forms of aid to Members {of the group} in case of specific need, whereby Members mutually agree to contribute monies to support this common goal.” O.Fisher

Finally, although a believing Muslim is required to accept (destiny or pre-ordainment) which can incorporate misfortune, s/he is not a passive “victim of circumstances. Conversely, the believing Muslim is exhorted by the injunctions of the Holy Quran to proactively take precautions in order to minimize potential misfortune, losses or injury from unfortunate events. One specific such instruction appears in Hadith to the owner of the camel to first tie your camel then rely upon the destiny ordained by Allah (swt).[Al Tirmidhi Vol.4,p.668].

A Perspective on Takaful from Islamic Scholars

The Majority viewpoint by contemporary Islamic scholars is that Takaful (cooperative insurance) is fully consistent with Shariah principles. This perspective is upheld by numerous meetings and resolutions :

* Council of Saudi Ulama (1397 Ah/1977 CE) resolution

* Fiqh Council of Muslim World League (1398/1978) resolution

* Fiqh council of Organization of Islamic Conference (1405/1985)

* Islamic Fiqh Week Conference, Damascus 1961

* Second Conference of Muslim Scholars, Cairo 1965

* Symposium on Islamic Jurisprudence, Libya 1972

* First International Conference on Islamic Economics, Meccah February 1976

* The Islamic Conference,Mekkah,October 1976

The esteemed shariah advisory Board of Bank Aljazira confirms also its viewpoint and whole heartedly endorsed the Family and Group Takaful Programs now offered by Bank Aljazira .{Refer to Fatwa dated April 2001}.

-THE END-

Source: http://www.takaful.com.sa/m1sub2.asp
(13 April 2008)

Leave a Comment